- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:47:01 +0100
- To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnAvxbJNyKbO3dF14WfWmfZvh89c5j6HoJyoFkU-odQLA@mail.gmail.com>
Or this: <blockquote> <p><cite>Chris Mills</cite> said: "What's that on your face?"</p> <p><cite>I</cite> replied: Don't you like my goat<del>s</del>ee?</p> <footer><cite>bruce lawson</cite> - <time>August 2013</time></footer> </blockquote> -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 16 August 2013 13:40, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > a question: what is wrong (if anything) with using <footer> in this > context to delineate citation from quote? > > <blockquote> > <p>Do you like my goat<del>s</del>ee?</p> > <footer><cite>bruce lawson</cite> - <time>August 2013</time></footer> > </blockquote> > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> > > > On 16 August 2013 13:12, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jukka, >> >> I don't think I saw any actual reason, but that's really immaterial. >>> >> >> to put it another way, I didnt see any good argument to restrict it >> >> From my review of the data, it is often used for attributing something to >> an author (some examples) >> >> Posted by <cite>jvaughan</cite> >>> >>> <cite class="textalt text2xsml">~ Bob, Thornleigh</cite> >>> >>> <cite class="e company"><a href="/encyclopedia/company.php?id=10">Manga >>> Entertainment</a></cite> says release is likely on October 22, will >>> include digital comic. >>> >>> <cite class="e person"><a >>> href="/encyclopedia/people.php?id=1009">Kouichi Yamadera</a></cite>, <cite >>> class="e person"><a href="/encyclopedia/people.php?id=75973">Hiromasa >>> Taguchi</a></cite> >>> >>> <cite>— <span class="quotescollection_author">Mark >>> S</span></cite> >>> >>> <cite id="comments"> >>> 00644: <a href='http://www.ask-oracle.com/members/stefjay/' >>> class='url'>stef</a> </cite> >>> >>> <cite> >>> <a class="usuario" href="/usuario/kyra-on" title="Ir a la página de >>> usuario de Maria Gonzalez">Maria Gonzalez</a> >>> <img src="http://img.genbetasocialmedia.com/lp2/v2/images/stars-4.png" >>> alt="*" /> >>> </cite> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >> >> >> On 16 August 2013 12:35, Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>wrote: >> >>> 2013-08-16 14:10, Steve Faulkner wrote: >>> >>>> Ok so reading the various historical threads and articles on the issue >>>> there appears to be good reasons for allowing the use of <cite> in context >>>> of an citing an author as well as a title of a work. >>>> >>> >>> I don't think I saw any actual reason, but that's really immaterial. >>> >>> >>> Looking at how cite is used in the wild [1] it is often used in this >>>> way. >>>> >>> >>> Looking at the collection of actual usage, although it is often >>> difficult to guess what the content really is and why <cite> is used, it >>> becomes evident that software processing HTML documents cannot make any >>> assumptions about the meaning of <cite>. Since people use e.g. >>> <cite>|<cite>, <cite>46,282</cite>, and <cite>Copyright © 2012 Fairfax >>> Media</cite>, there's nothing semantic we can assume. The only thing that >>> we can reasonably infer is that authors probably wanted the text to appear >>> in italic, since that's how browsers actually render <cite>, and that's all >>> they do with it. >>> >>> Since <cite> is in practice just one of the ways to italicize text >>> (along with <i>, <em>, and <var>), there's no reason to assume that authors >>> haven't used it that way inside <blockquote> elements, too. So assigning a >>> semantic role to it when appearing in <blockquote> would be arbitrary and >>> lead to wrong conclusions about existing documents. >>> >>> The practical impact would be small, if no software would actually do >>> something based on a definition that says that <cite> somehow semantically >>> relates to an enclosing <blockquote>. But if programs won't do such things, >>> what does it matter which markup is used for quotations amd citations? >>> >>> -- >>> Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~**jkorpela/<http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 12:48:10 UTC