W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2013

Re: TextTrack API changes

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:36:25 +0200
To: "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: "Bob Lund" <B.Lund@cablelabs.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>, "Jerry Smith, (WINDOWS)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, "Mark Vickers @ Comcast" <mark_vickers@cable.comcast.com>
Message-ID: <op.wv43izbfidj3kv@simons-macbook-pro.local>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:11:30 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> Silvia, you don't have carte blanche to make backwards incompatible
> changes. Period. I don't imagine why you might think you do.  We have
> objections to this change. How far do you want to escalate this? Just say
> OK, and revert it, then we can stop discussing it. For your info, it is  
> not
> the onus of the objectors to convince you not to make this change. The  
> onus
> is on you to convince the rest of us that a backward incompatible change  
> is
> justified. And you haven't done that. The Zero Change Proposal wins.

The change involved more things than moving .text and .getCueAsHTML(). I  
have only seen arguments to move back these two, not to revert everything.

Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 08:37:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:02 UTC