- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:36:25 +0200
- To: "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: "Bob Lund" <B.Lund@cablelabs.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>, "Jerry Smith, (WINDOWS)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, "Mark Vickers @ Comcast" <mark_vickers@cable.comcast.com>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:11:30 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > Silvia, you don't have carte blanche to make backwards incompatible > changes. Period. I don't imagine why you might think you do. We have > objections to this change. How far do you want to escalate this? Just say > OK, and revert it, then we can stop discussing it. For your info, it is > not > the onus of the objectors to convince you not to make this change. The > onus > is on you to convince the rest of us that a backward incompatible change > is > justified. And you haven't done that. The Zero Change Proposal wins. The change involved more things than moving .text and .getCueAsHTML(). I have only seen arguments to move back these two, not to revert everything. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 08:37:21 UTC