- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:27:17 +0100
- To: Angie Radtke <a.radtke@derauftritt.de>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmxFm6ViydOAf-UUv3EonO5WBe700SZGKhGe8H844znsQ@mail.gmail.com>
thanks Angie and welcome! both you emails made it to the list. will grep the data looking for bootstrap signs note ANYONE is able to use the data and run their on queries - thats what its there for: http://webdevdata.org -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 8 April 2013 10:18, Angie Radtke <a.radtke@derauftritt.de> wrote: > Am 08.04.2013 10:26, schrieb Steve Faulkner: > > how can identify if bootstrap is being used? >> >> -- >> >> > It is very easy. Bootstrap is based non less. > Peolpe can change the name of bootstrap.css to whatever they like. So this > is not the indicator. > But you can see it by the used class-names in the HTML-Document. > > Hope this mail will reach the list. > > My former mail here: > > > Subtitles are an important journalistic style medium. > To find a working solution for them can be very helpful. > > I think the small element is not the correct markup and should be used > for the small printed stuff, because the relation to its parent is not > clear. > > My first idea was to change the the interpretation of <sub>, because > it isn't used very often and it is a speaking word. > > It makes clear that there is something underneath. > > But I think this idea is to far away from its original meaning > (Math), people can be confused and a new element for its original > function is needed. > > On the otherhand screenreader will say "subscripted" subheadcontent. It > is maybe not so far from what we want. > > I think we have not much options to solve this problem at the moment. > Using the small-element is a workaround not more. > Bootstrap itself is used by joomla, so using will increase over the next > years. I hope will have influence here to make it better as it is for > the moment. > > > Bye Angie > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 10:28:27 UTC