W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2012

RE: [canvas] integration with WebIDL (correction)

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:05:47 -0700
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <83F37C1A4497B54589EAEDC750D03A9473B4B552@nambx09.corp.adobe.com>
I made a mistake in my previous email. 
WebIDL was always the interface to Canvas.

I believe this change is needed but I can't find a bug report.
Is it necessary to have a bug on this and just mark it as fixed, or is it fine to just have this change?

From: Rik Cabanier [cabanier@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:42 PM
To: public-html@w3.org
Subject: [canvas] integration with WebIDL


the canvas specification recently moved to WebIDL for its function signatures.
Even though there should be no change in behavior, I can't find if this change was discussed or approved by the group.

Does anyone know?
Adding WebIDL to the interface fixed the issue that the canvas IDL didn't match the behavior (i.e. if you set globablAlpha with NaN, you are not supposed to get a type error)

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 03:06:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:27 UTC