[Bug 19047] New: how about minlength? i'd like to see certain fields to have a minimum amoung of characters for validation

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19047

           Summary: how about minlength? i'd like to see certain fields to
                    have a minimum amoung of characters for validation
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the
                    -maxlength-attribute
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org,
                    public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org, ayg@aryeh.name,
                    mounir.lamouri@gmail.com


This was was cloned from bug 10053 as part of operation LATER convergence.
Originally filed: 2010-06-30 02:41:00 +0000

================================================================================
 #0   contributor@whatwg.org                          2010-06-30 02:41:03 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-maxlength-attribute

Comment:
how about minlength? i'd like to see certain fields to have a minimum amoung
of characters for validation

Posted from: 209.99.13.239
================================================================================
 #1   Ian 'Hixie' Hickson                             2010-08-28 04:48:30 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Maybe one day. Let's let the browsers catch up first.
================================================================================
 #2   Ian 'Hixie' Hickson                             2010-09-10 09:39:49 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Bug 10308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
================================================================================
 #3   Mounir Lamouri                                  2011-01-26 20:56:51 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Bug 11870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
================================================================================
 #4   Aryeh Gregor                                    2011-01-27 01:02:51 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that minlength="n" is equivalent to pattern=".{n}".  Not clear if it's
common enough to really need special handling.
================================================================================
 #5   Mounir Lamouri                                  2011-01-27 15:25:48 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Note that minlength="n" is equivalent to pattern=".{n}".  Not clear if it's
> common enough to really need special handling.

No, minlength="n" isn't equivalent too pattern=".{n}". @pattern should only be
used for specific cases given that it removes all semantic.

In addition of passwords fields that require a minimum length (I guess that
would be the primary use case), minlength could be used for field that require
a specific length in association with maxlength (with maxlength and minlength
having the same value).
================================================================================

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 21:59:52 UTC