- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:24:34 -0400
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>
On 09/20/2012 10:15 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote: > > I have more general concern. I think it would be useful to have some > general rules covering this earlier then later. For example some people > are upset by what the plan is proposing for longdesc. If they will make > all efforts to create separate extension spec and there will not be > clear rules when this gets into validator they might end up in very > unfair situation. On that topic we did have the foresight to check with Mike, and got prior agreement that long description support would be added once such a document attains FPWD status. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 14:27:29 UTC