- From: Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:15:02 +0200
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 09:15:31 UTC
Yes, good call. Definitely need qualification on that point. On 20 September 2012 11:04, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:33:55 +0200, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/**decision-policy/html5-2014-**plan.html<http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html> >> > > The section on "185 drop pubdate attribute" says "Retain the current > pubdate attribute in the spec. Identify it as an at risk feature." Is this > a typo or misunderstanding, given that the spec currently doesn't include > pubdate on the <time> element? > > -- > Philip Jägenstedt > Core Developer > Opera Software > > -- ian devlin e: ian@iandevlin.com w: www.iandevlin.com t: @iandevlin <http://www.twitter.com/iandevlin> skype: idevlin buy my book: html5 multimedia: develop and design<http://html5multimedia.com>
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 09:15:31 UTC