W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Mailing Lists (was Re: Evolving AppCache discussions)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:57:05 -0400
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-id: <B008895D-6311-4B6A-8EF7-8D799CF27EE8@apple.com>
To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>

Jonas & Adrian,

Do you feel the subject tag approach would not work for you (either as a tool for filtering mail or as a way to scan for what you care about)? How do you feel about how it works in CSS WG or Web Apps WG?


On Sep 14, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote:

> On 14 September 2012 10:28, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> That said, I understand that you are concerned about fragmenting the
>> working group. One alternative is that we use the "fix appcache"
>> community group that already exists. And which I believe was set up
>> with help from W3C staff with the explicit goal of fixing the
>> appcache.
> This is the thing I'm most worried about. If we decide that everyone has
> to see everything then there's a risk we will drive people away to other
> groups. I'd prefer that the working group that has responsibility for the
> Recommendation-track feature host the discussion.
> I spend a lot of time sifting through mail trying not to miss the topics
> I'm interested in amongst the ones I'm not. For me, the public-html-media
> list has been very successful in reducing this time.
> Cheers,
> Adrian.
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 18:57:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:27 UTC