- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:57:05 -0400
- To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Jonas & Adrian, Do you feel the subject tag approach would not work for you (either as a tool for filtering mail or as a way to scan for what you care about)? How do you feel about how it works in CSS WG or Web Apps WG? Regards, Maciej On Sep 14, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2012 10:28, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> That said, I understand that you are concerned about fragmenting the >> working group. One alternative is that we use the "fix appcache" >> community group that already exists. And which I believe was set up >> with help from W3C staff with the explicit goal of fixing the >> appcache. > > This is the thing I'm most worried about. If we decide that everyone has > to see everything then there's a risk we will drive people away to other > groups. I'd prefer that the working group that has responsibility for the > Recommendation-track feature host the discussion. > > I spend a lot of time sifting through mail trying not to miss the topics > I'm interested in amongst the ones I'm not. For me, the public-html-media > list has been very successful in reducing this time. > > Cheers, > > Adrian. > > >
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 18:57:45 UTC