- From: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:42:03 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer > <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Steve Faulkner >>> <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> hi Cameron, the same arguments you are using for <maincontent> could >>>> be used for role=main >>> >>> Not so, as i said at the end of the last mail: >>> >>> "The great thing about ARIA is that it requires people to be explicit, >>> and with the intention of providing accessibility" >> >> Wouldn't it be nice it the page markup that every Web publisher >> provides was automatically accessible without the need to explicitly >> provide for accessibility? >> >> Silvia. > > Isn't that the ultimate goal? > > In which case, people will all be using ARIA roles anyway. > Sorry, i misread. I don't think there can ever be that much flexibility without needing attributes. So ARIA is the correct implementation. Thanks, Cameron Jones
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 22:42:30 UTC