- From: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:38:14 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Cameron Jones, Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:52:54 +0100: >>> >>> Now I am waiting for what you say to the fact that <p> is literally >>> going to spit <maincontent> out of itself. Just like it spits <div> out >>> itself. That is something that authors are going to see - without >>> validator. > >> maincontent { >> display: inline; >> } > > That doesn't help, my friend. A <div> is spat out of <p> regardless how > you style it: > > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/1749 > > And <maincontent> will suffer the same fate. > -- > leif halvard silli As someone who only writes valid markup i'm not overly familiar with browser error handling as i don't encounter it. The examples i have contrived are meant to illustrate that humans are self-serving and not specification-following. When the purpose of such an element is for interfacing for accessibility, having misused high-semantic elements would have greater negative impact than people having to use low-semantic elements with or without accessibility annotations. But i do concede that i should watch the claimed modesty of such contrived examples. It all seems beside the point, however. Thanks, Cameron Jones
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 22:38:42 UTC