W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Info from HTML5 editors: merging WHATWG patches

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:27:52 -0700
Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <88F840BE-0C1E-4124-85A2-B387E5999900@apple.com>
To: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>

On Sep 9, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com> wrote:

> On Sep 9, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Adrian Roselli
>> <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote:
>>> I am stil new to the process around here, but I just want to make sure I understand -- this means @srcset is moving to the on hold / wait for HTML.next branch, but that <picture> is still under consideration.
>>> Am I correct?
>> No, this is not the case. All new features are being moved into
>> HTML.next unless the WG agrees to integrate them into HTML5. At this
>> point I believe the general consensus is simply that adaptive images
>> are a new feature and therefore there will be no solution in HTML5.
>> The solution will be deferred to HTML.next.
> It was the chairsí decision that `picture` be considered for the current snapshot ( https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384, http://www.w3.org/2012/07/26-html-wg-minutes.html ). I wasnít aware that this had changed.

Anything can be proposed, but the Chairs have not made any decision to specifically include any new features. I personally still strongly encourage all new features to be deferred to a future version. That's particularly the case with features, such as adaptive/responsive images, where we are likely to have competing proposals and the solution space is still a topic of active discussion.

Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 23:28:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:27 UTC