- From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 13:06:10 +0000
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
I am stil new to the process around here, but I just want to make sure I understand -- this means @srcset is moving to the on hold / wait for HTML.next branch, but that <picture> is still under consideration. Am I correct? What's the process if WHATWG runs with @srcset and this WG hasn't come to consensus on <picture>? > From: Silvia Pfeiffer [silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com] > > Thanks for your feedback. That agrees with my initial reaction - > thanks for confirming. > I'll plan to move that branch to B3 where it can wait until there will > be a HTML.next spec. > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Silvia, > > > > many thanks for your work! > > > >>* feature/whatwg_srcset > > > This patch introduces the @srcset attribute on images. > > > Review here: > > >https://github.com/w3c/html/compare/master...feature;whatwg_srcset > > > > Since the <picture> element is under active consideration by the WG > > and there is no consensus on srcset or <picture> > > > > I would suggest not to add srcset at this time.
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 13:06:37 UTC