Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook

Hi Sam,

>   * We have a set of proposals for the path forward and -- this is
>     the key part -- NO ACTIVE DISCUSSION OR SCHEDULE.  I will note
>     that one of those proposals is from a co-editor of ARIA 1.0
>     itself.

Do you mean Rich and PF's formal objection [1]? They want one sentence
removed, right? So why throw out the baby with the bath water?
Eliminating the essential along with the inessential isn't prudent.

Nuke the inessential/offending sentence from HTML5. Problem solved.

Best Regards,
Laura
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0402.html

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 14:33:01 UTC