- From: Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:06:35 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:41:49 +0100, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@målform.no> wrote: > If we say that <picture> should have img role, then we imply that > alternative text should be provided via an attribute. Why? > This means that > AT will pick the alternative text from the img element, as long as they > don't support picture. Fine. But it also means that at the moment when > picture support is enabled, they will suddenly start to take the > alternative text from another element - picture. Why? Can't we require UAs to take alt from content (fallback <img>) even in that case? Basically behave *as if* there was alt on the picture, but don't actually use `alt` attribute to implement that? -- regards, Kornel
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:06:59 UTC