Re: maincontent extension - data on use of id=main and id=content in web pages

Hi,

First off, really great background research.

> To my tastes, 'main' or 'content' to be a better name for this element
than 'maincontent'.

Although I agree that "main" or "content" are more streamlined and
attractive element names, I personally think that element name
"maincontent" has better semantics than "main" or "content". From the
perspective of a developer coming to this new element for the first time,
the element name "maincontent" is immediately much more meaningful than a
element more simply named "main" (main what? Main area of this section?
Main area of this footer?) or named "content" (content of what? Content of
the article? all page content?). If "maincontent" isn't an option, then I
do agree that "main" is better than the more general "content".

Should the WAI-ARIA landmark role=main still be used on this new element?
e.g.  <main role="main"> ? Or will the User Agents take care of this over
time.


-- 

Kind Regards,

Lauren O'Donovan



On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Maciej,
>
> > To my tastes, 'main' or 'content' to be a better name for this element
> than 'maincontent'.
>
> I personally would prefer to concentrate on the technical aspects of the
> spec text definition of the feature, but a number of people have commented
> on the name and it appears that there is a preference emerging for
>
> <main> over <content> or <maincontent>
>
> I am not wedded to the name <maincontent> and it can be easily changed to
> <main> I will leave it as is for a while for further feedback and will
> revisit when I bring it forward for publication as a FPWD.
>
> regards
> Steve
>
>
> On 17 October 2012 08:02, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> <chair hat off>
>>
>> To my tastes, 'main' or 'content' to be a better name for this element
>> than 'maincontent'.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the process of developing the <maincontent> element spec [1] I looked
>> at data from a number of sources [3] on frequency of usage  of id values to
>> indicate the main content area of a web page.
>>
>> I  also used data [2] I gathered in April 2012 based on a URL list of the
>> top 10,000 most popular web sites.
>>
>> In preparing the data [2] I subsetted the total usable HTML documents
>> (approx 8900 pages - the home pages for sites in the top 10,000 URLs list )
>> by searching for the use of the HTML5 doctype (approx 1545 pages). I
>> figured that documents using the HTML5 doctype would provide the freshest
>> code.
>>
>>
>> What is apparent from the home page data in the sample:
>> *  use of a descriptive id to value to identify the main content area of
>> a web page is common.
>> (id="main"|id="content"|id="maincontent"|id="content-main"|id="main-content"
>> used on 39% of the pages in the sample [2])
>>
>>  * There is a strong correlation between use of role='main' on an element
>> with id values of 'content' or 'main' or permutations. (when used = 101
>> pages)  77% were on an element with id values of 'content' or 'main' or
>> permutations.
>> * There is a strong correlation between use of id values of 'content' or
>> 'main' or permutations as targets for 'skip to content'/'skip to main
>> content' links (when used = 67 pages) 78% of skip link targets # were
>> elements with id values of 'content' or 'main' or permutations.
>> * There appears to be a strong correlation in the identification of
>> content areas (with id values of 'content' or 'main' or permutations.) as
>> what is described in the spec as appropriate content to be contained with a
>> <maincontent> element [1]:
>>
>> "The maincontent element represents<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#represents>the main
>> content section of the body of a document or application. The main
>> content section consists of content that is directly related to or expands
>> upon the central topic of a document or central functionality of an
>> application.
>> ...
>> The main content section of a document includes content that is unique to
>> that document and excludes content that is repeated across a set of
>> documents such as site navigation links, copyright information, site logos
>> and banners and search forms (unless the document or applications main
>> function is that of a search form)."
>>
>> I have prepared approx 440 sample pages [4] from the same URL set with
>> CSS to outline and identify use of container elements with id values of
>> 'content' and/or 'main' and role=main, these samples can be used to
>> visually assess how closely the spec text matches the reality of element
>> usage with the stated id values.
>>
>> The first link in each list item links to the original page the second
>> link prefixed with "copy" is the same page with the CSS added.
>> http://www.html5accessibility.com/tests/HTML5-main-content/
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-extensions/raw-file/tip/maincontent/index.html
>>
>> [2]
>> http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2012/04/html5-accessibility-chops-data-for-the-masses/
>>
>> [3] http://triin.net/2006/06/12/CSS#figure-34,
>> http://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/2005/11/real_world_sema.html,
>> http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-common-attributes/#id
>> --
>> with regards
>>
>> Steve Faulkner
>> Technical Director - TPG
>>
>> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com<http://www.html5accessibility.com/>|
>> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
>> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
>> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
>> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
>