- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:56:17 +0300
- To: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:44 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Monday 2012-10-15 16:22 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Steve Faulkner >> <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> > What does "broader buy-in, including from implementors, showing that the >> > extension specification is seen as a good idea." mean in practice? >> >> In practice, it would mean two implementors working on two distinct >> browser engines saying that the proposed feature is a good idea that >> they would like to implement and realistically might. (No >> authoritative commitment to implement or a statement about timeline >> required.) > > I think this threshold might be a bit weak in the face of > disagreement among implementors working on a single browser engine. > I think that, in the presence of disagreement by other implementors > working on the same engine, the threshold ought to be based on > whether the feature would realistically be accepted and shipped. Indeed. I failed to cover the case where there is also implementor opposition. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 06:56:45 UTC