- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:31:30 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 2012-11-29 18:15, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > At the time we discussed Note track vs REC at TPAC, I did not > mention anything about withdrawing Formal Objections, temporarily or otherwise. > I simply did not think about it. > > After thinking about it and discussing, I've concluded that it would > be better to have a Working Group Decision OK, I have no problem with this. However, please run the poll with independent questions about: a) Whether the documents should or should not contain any normative statements. b) Whether the document should be on the REC-track or NOTE-track. > [*] To pre-emptively address potential worries: if WG decides to > proceed with these documents on the REC track, this approach will still > result in your Formal Objections being forwarded to the Director to > consider as part of the CR transition and will not prejudice them in any > way. In that case, since the presence of a formal objection does not preclude the WG from conducting a poll on the issue, it seems my formal objection can simply remain conditional on the document's REC-track status. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:31:55 UTC