- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:23:08 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
- CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
On 11/19/2012 08:14 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 11/19/2012 07:19 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> At the HTML F2F, I was asked to provide rationale for my previously >> filed formal objection to "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text >> alternatives" (alt-techniques). > > At TPAC, there was also discussion of an alternative path to > resolution[1]. Repeating what I previously stated[2], in case it was > overlooked due to the subject line: > > If the Formal Objections on this matter[3] are not withdrawn, they will > be forwarded for consideration by the Director as we proceed to CR. If > they are withdrawn, we will proceed with the Working Group decision > process[4] on this matter. Once again, I will ask if you both if you wish to proceed with the Working Group decision process or if you wish this to be processed as a Formal Objection at this time. If you wish to proceed via a Working Group decision, please indicate that you are withdrawing your Formal Objection (without prejudice) and opening a bug on the relevant specification. > - Sam Ruby > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-html-wg-minutes.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0141.html > [3] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html > [4] > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 15:23:43 UTC