Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-11-15- Actions, CR drafts, FPWD for main, Task Force reports

On 11/16/2012 05:53 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
> Hi Chairs,
>
>           mjs: polyglot and alt techniques documents need to have some
>             issues resolved before they move forward
>             ... both have objections re: note- or rec-track
>             ... both documents need custom cr exit criteria
>             ... they consist entirely of author conformance criteria
>             without ua conformance requirements
>             ... hoping the editors will propose cr exit criteria
>             ... we also need cr candidate drafts to be prepared
>
>
> I think the exit criteria for the alt spec could be based on concepts
> used in wcag 2.0 exit criteria
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/implementation-report/
>
> In the HTML WG meet at TPAC, the chairs present requested that rationale
> for why the spec should be normative or not, be provided (promptly), I
> sent a brief email as requested [1] 2 weeks ago, no response.

If the Formal Objections on this matter[2] are not withdrawn, they will 
be forwarded for consideration by the Director as we proceed to CR.  If 
they are withdrawn, we will proceed with the Working Group decision 
process[3] on this matter.

> regards
> SteveF
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0009.html
[2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html
[3] 
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec

Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 14:08:12 UTC