- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:07:33 -0500
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
On 11/16/2012 05:53 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > Hi Chairs, > > mjs: polyglot and alt techniques documents need to have some > issues resolved before they move forward > ... both have objections re: note- or rec-track > ... both documents need custom cr exit criteria > ... they consist entirely of author conformance criteria > without ua conformance requirements > ... hoping the editors will propose cr exit criteria > ... we also need cr candidate drafts to be prepared > > > I think the exit criteria for the alt spec could be based on concepts > used in wcag 2.0 exit criteria > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/implementation-report/ > > In the HTML WG meet at TPAC, the chairs present requested that rationale > for why the spec should be normative or not, be provided (promptly), I > sent a brief email as requested [1] 2 weeks ago, no response. If the Formal Objections on this matter[2] are not withdrawn, they will be forwarded for consideration by the Director as we proceed to CR. If they are withdrawn, we will proceed with the Working Group decision process[3] on this matter. > regards > SteveF > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0009.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html [3] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 14:08:12 UTC