W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:21:44 -0800
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-id: <9CAF0915-D8F9-44E7-B6BD-1186B2D74B1B@apple.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>

On Nov 25, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> The question that I'm asking the HTML WG to discuss is why it's
> publishing a spec whose functionality is duplicated in another W3C spec.

The HTML WG is doing so based on the following Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76, where the Working Group explicitly decided not to pick a winner between HTML Microdata and HTML+RDFa: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/att-0218/issue-76-decision.html>

This decision was largely based on the following Change Proposal, which argued persuasively in favor of "allowing many flowers to bloom": <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0299.html>

Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 22:22:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:58 UTC