- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:52:02 +0900
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, 2012-11-04 20:59 +0100: > Polyglot is nothing more then just profile of HTML5 which defines subset > of syntax. There is no reason why definition of such profile shouldn't > be normative. If you for some reason decide to conform to such profile, > it's much better if such profile is normatively defined. While I don't have a personal position either way on whether it's better to have such a profile normatively defined, I can say that I know others on the W3C staff and the TAG have expressed that position. The argument is that the Polyglot specification is normatively defining what a "polyglot document" is. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 07:52:16 UTC