- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 23:40:21 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17203 Summary: Should session ID be required? Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Encrypted Media Extensions AssignedTo: adrianba@microsoft.com ReportedBy: ddorwin@google.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, watsonm@netflix.com Depends on: 16613 Session ID is currently optional in all cases. Should we require it to always be implemented? The main advantage is more consistency for applications, and it seems pretty easy to implement something (i.e. incrementing counter). Are there reasons that a user agent/CDM would not want to implement an ID? Bug 16613 proposes representing sessions as objects, which could reduce the number of sessionId parameters and attributes. The ID would likely still need to be exposed somehow, meaning this question would still need to be answered. Bug 16739 relates to the format of Session ID. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:03:21 UTC