W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2012

[Bug 17082] New: Discuss whether Media Source methods should be in separate object

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 23:26:57 +0000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-17082-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17082

           Summary: Discuss whether Media Source methods should be in
                    separate object
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Media Source Extensions
        AssignedTo: adrianba@microsoft.com
        ReportedBy: acolwell@chromium.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


This question has come up several times when I talk to people about the Media
Source Extensions so I think it deserves some discussion.

Should the Media Source methods & attributes be in a separate object instead of
added to the HTMLMediaElement?


Here are a few other follow up questions to spark discussion:
1. What do we gain by moving this into a separate object?
2. If they are placed in a separate object, can the object be associated with
multiple tags?
3. Will this prevent declarative syntax to enable Media Source and reuse of the
<source> fallback mechanism?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 10:35:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:52 UTC