- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 10:01:49 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 2012-05-19 09:43, Daniel Glazman wrote: > ... >> Do you have any opinion or knowledge of what other tool vendors might >> do under this same circumstance? > > In short, you're asking tool vendors to remove the only hint in the > markup that will let the viewer of the source of a given page know that > the page was created by their tool?-) Honestly, no, I don't want to > remove that and I suspect other editing tool vendors will have the > same opinion, at first glance. The HTML WG will have to be extremely > persuasive to change that opinion, IMHO... > And I don't see why it should have to be persuasive. HTML5 is here to > make html grow on the basis on common practice. Common practice is that > the generator meta tag is used w/o constraints at this time. Adding > constraints to it seems to me contrary to the design of html5 and the > needs of the industry. > ... Absolutely. I use the generator information to embed version information (which version of my XSLT code, and run by which XSLT processor); this is extremely useful when trying to find out where problems in a generated page come from. I do not plan to change this; even if this means that no alt checking will take place in the future. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 08:02:20 UTC