- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 00:56:04 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > However, it is very hard to understand the Details Section > of AllowAriaReferHidden as presented. If that CP is not withdrawn, may > we please have an English language version of the proposed Details? Perhaps it would help to link into the rendered spec from the CVS server at the requested revision: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/html5/spec/Overview.html?rev=1.5574;content-type=text%2Fhtml#the-hidden-attribute Having said that, at least asking for a reversion of a checkin is fairly unambiguous. I wish there was a similarly unambiguous details section for the TF's proposal too. Taken literally as series of edit instructions, it would result in a spec that defines the meaning of @hidden twice but in different ways and repeats verbatim the text: "All HTML elements may have the hidden content attribute set. The hidden attribute is a boolean attribute." -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 23:56:56 UTC