W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Chair review of the issue-205 text-editing-canvas change proposals

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:24:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4FAA8C1F.4060103@intertwingly.net>
To: "Edward O'Connor (ted@oconnor.cx)" <ted@oconnor.cx>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 04/17/2012 08:20 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> No_edit:
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/No_edit_change_proposal_for_canvas_text_editing
>
> No_edit does not address the use cases provided. It asserts that the
> rationale is "well reasoned" without providing justification for this
> assertion. It also makes other assertions such as "superior" and "more
> accessible" without providing any supporting evidence or addressing the
> original proposal.
>
> The details section is incomplete in that it lists examples of things
> that could be added instead of providing a set of edit instructions,
> specific enough that they can be applied without ambiguity.

If the details section is not corrected by May 17th, the chairs will 
consider this proposal to be withdrawn.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 15:24:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:23 UTC