Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals

On 06/07/2012 04:58 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> Sam wrote:
>
>> On 03/27/2012 04:36 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
>>> Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>> Review of the following proposal:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189
>>>>
>>>> While there may be additional feedback should Julian's proposal be
>>>> updated, this feedback is focused on what is being proposed,
>>>> specifically: "Alter the appearance".
>>>>
>>>> As the appearance of the section of the specification under
>>>> consideration is fundamental to what is being proposed in this
>>>> specific proposal, and as the editor seems to believe that what
>>>> currently is in the spec is sufficiently visually distinct from IANA
>>>> registrations to prevent confusion, please obtain and incorporate
>>>> any feedback you feel is necessary from the editor prior to this
>>>> proposal being included in a call for consensus or survey.
>>>
>>> Will do!
>>
>> If this is not done by the 20th of June, we will consider this
>> proposal to be withdrawn.
>
> I haven't felt that any feedback from the editor is necessary. Is that
> sufficient for us to proceed to a survey on ISSUE-189 now? If not, I've
> CC'ed the editor. Ian, is the Change Proposal in [1] sufficiently clear
> for you to make any necessary edits, should it be adopted? Thanks.

Please remove the following text: "One such alteration is provided, as 
an example, in the diff below. The editor is free to apply this diff or 
to make such alterations as he deems sufficient to disambiguate this 
section from the various IANA registrations in the spec. "

Concurrently, feel free to modify the patch provided based on input from 
Ian or anybody else you wish.  Let us know when this is complete.

> Ted
>
> 1. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189

- Sam Ruby

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 23:28:37 UTC