Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals

On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> > On 03/27/2012 04:36 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> >> Sam wrote:
> >>
> >>> Review of the following proposal:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189
> >>>
> >>> While there may be additional feedback should Julian's proposal be 
> >>> updated, this feedback is focused on what is being proposed, 
> >>> specifically: "Alter the appearance".
> >>>
> >>> As the appearance of the section of the specification under 
> >>> consideration is fundamental to what is being proposed in this 
> >>> specific proposal, and as the editor seems to believe that what 
> >>> currently is in the spec is sufficiently visually distinct from IANA 
> >>> registrations to prevent confusion, please obtain and incorporate 
> >>> any feedback you feel is necessary from the editor prior to this 
> >>> proposal being included in a call for consensus or survey.
> >>
> >> Will do!
> >
> > If this is not done by the 20th of June, we will consider this 
> > proposal to be withdrawn.
> 
> I haven't felt that any feedback from the editor is necessary. Is that 
> sufficient for us to proceed to a survey on ISSUE-189 now? If not, I've 
> CC'ed the editor. Ian, is the Change Proposal in [1] sufficiently clear 
> for you to make any necessary edits, should it be adopted? Thanks.
> 1. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189

I don't really see how it could be any _more_ clear.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 23:01:23 UTC