Hi Sam, You wrote: > At the current time, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on > this proposal. If anybody would like to raise an objection during this > time, we will require them to accompany their objection with a > concrete and complete change proposal. Like I wrote in [1], the proposal on the table removes the existing feature without providing a replacement for it. Here's a Change Proposal which provides a suitable replacement: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-206 While this Change Proposal is both concrete and complete, I intend to solicit comments from conformance checker developers which may result in testimonials I would like to cite in the Rationale section. Any such changes will be done before the August 8 CfC deadline. > Note: we are aware (per below) that Ted is working on a counter > proposal. The intent of this CfC is to make a hard deadline for such. Fair enough. :) Sorry I didn't get this in on Friday; I'm recovering from a cold. TedReceived on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 22:14:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:54 UTC