- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:34:38 -0400
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On 07/30/2012 02:54 PM, Janina Sajka wrote: > Sam: > > The HTML-A11Y Task Force Text Subteam will consider whether to update > its position at its teleconference Tuesday. I expect that there will be > a desire to do so regardless of which Issue 204 is adopted and that this > will require several weeks. I'll provide an update following the call > Tuesday. As we would like to proceed to survey, the co-chairs request that all proposal updates be completed by August 17th. > Janina - Sam Ruby > Sam Ruby writes: >> Two corrections below (copy/paste errors). Sorry for the confusion. >> Kudos to mjs for spotting them. >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >> On 07/27/2012 11:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> At this point issue 204 has gone to survey, seeking objections on two >>> proposals. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4 >>> >>> In order to help the chairs plan our next steps, I would appreciate some >>> indication as to whether or not people will be requesting an opportunity >>> to update their proposals based on the decision, and if so, an estimate >>> as to how long that would take. >>> >>> So regarding the "LongdescZeroEdit" proposal[1]... >>> >>> 1) Should the "AllowAriaReferHidden" proposal be selected, would the >>> InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long do you >>> estimate that it would take? >> >> Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ... >> >>> 2) Should the "Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4" proposal be >>> selected, would the InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if >> >> Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ... >> >>> so, how long do you estimate that it would take? >>> >>> I want to emphasize that this query is solely for planning purposes and >>> will not affect the outcome of issue 204. >>> >>> The survey on issue 204 closes on Friday August 3rd. A response by that >>> time would be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> - Sam Ruby >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/LongdescZeroEdit >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections >>> Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:19:07 +0000 >>> Resent-From: public-html@w3.org >>> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:18:04 +0000 >>> From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> >>> To: public-html@w3.org <public-html@w3.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/204 >>> >>> The HTML WG has not reached consensus on how to exempt ARIA attributes >> >from the rule that prohibits reference to hidden elements. >>> >>> The poll is available here and it will run through Fri Aug 3: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-204-objection-poll/ >>> >>> Please read the introductory text before entering your response. >>> >>> In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only >>> need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly >>> strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked >>> objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's >>> objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and >>> will not be counting votes. >>> >>> /paulc >>> >>> HTML WG co-chair >>> >>> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada >>> >>> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 >>> >>> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 >>> >>> >>> >>> >
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:35:09 UTC