Re: Moving forward with Issue-204

On 07/20/2012 06:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> I'll respond more fully later, but it appears that you added back in the
> instructions to revert change 6890.  This is unacceptable as previously
> noted as it contains unrelated changes and would leave the document in
> an inconsistent state.

Additional information can be found here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jul/0124.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jun/0078.html

> Please update the change proposal to contain a self contained,
> complete,consistent, and understandable description of the change you
> are proposing.

- Sam Ruby

> /Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless/
>
>
> -----Original message-----
>
>     *From: *Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>*
>     To: *HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>*
>     Sent: *Fri, Jul 20, 2012 21:23:05 GMT+00:00*
>     Subject: *Re: Moving forward with Issue-204
>
>     Hi Sam,
>
>     You wrote:
>
>      > To facilitate matters, I replaced the link to the
>      > diff with a link to the text I posted previously[1]:
>      >
>      >
>     http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden&oldid=13272#Details
>
>     Thanks! I think that's an accurate description of the proposed
>     change; I've incorporated it into the updated proposal.
>
>      > Please let us know when you are finished.
>
>     I have updated the Change Proposal to include (a minor variation) on
>     the text I proposed the other day. Jonas, Matthew, do you think the
>     updated Details section accurately reflects what you intended the
>     Change Proposal to achieve?
>
>
>     Thanks,
>     Ted
>

Received on Sunday, 22 July 2012 13:39:34 UTC