RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip by Amicable Resolution

> "Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements can consume undue time and energy"
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263
> Currently the Chairs do not have consensus on what, if any, change to make for this bug. Comments are welcome, including ones using this issue as an example.

The Chairs are still looking for input on bug 13263 on the Decision Policy.  We invite replies to this thread or input directly on the bug.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:27 PM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip by Amicable Resolution


On Dec 17, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> 
> On second reading, "not" implies instead of.  I believe that the topic in question is one that reasonable people can disagree on, and that such topics merit discussions on this mailing list.  If every who cares about this issue will participate in a discussion on this list, and they can come to consensus, there is no need for issues, Change Proposals or Surveys.
> 
> What I did not mean to imply is that changes to the Decision Policy are off bounds.  Those that wish to pursue such are encourage to file bug reports against the Decision Policy itself.  Feel free to cite this bug as an example.

There's already a bug proposing potential different treatment of "editorial" type bugs:

"Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements can consume undue time and energy"
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13263

Currently the Chairs do not have consensus on what, if any, change to make for this bug. Comments are welcome, including ones using this issue as an example.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 15:13:51 UTC