Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip by Amicable Resolution

On Dec 17, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> On second reading, "not" implies instead of.  I believe that the topic in question is one that reasonable people can disagree on, and that such topics merit discussions on this mailing list.  If every who cares about this issue will participate in a discussion on this list, and they can come to consensus, there is no need for issues, Change Proposals or Surveys.
> What I did not mean to imply is that changes to the Decision Policy are off bounds.  Those that wish to pursue such are encourage to file bug reports against the Decision Policy itself.  Feel free to cite this bug as an example.

There's already a bug proposing potential different treatment of "editorial" type bugs:

"Issues that have no impact on conformance requirements can consume undue time and energy"

Currently the Chairs do not have consensus on what, if any, change to make for this bug. Comments are welcome, including ones using this issue as an example.


Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 21:28:04 UTC