On 2/28/2012 9:07 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > 2012/2/28 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com > <mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com>> > > In your other case (server is untrusted), DRM is unnecessary baggage; > you only need JS encryption/decryption that can be inserted between > the server and a <video> element of the user. This can be specified > and implemented without many of the concerns that people have been > raising about this proposal. > > > A solution that requires decryption of the actual media content in JS > would be unacceptable from a performance perspective, particularly on > resource constrained devices. The solution must be readily implemented > with reasonable performance on devices at different ends of the > spectrum, including TV/STBs (resource constrained). Citation needed. -Charles
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:27:36 UTC