Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Henri Sivonen <> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Glenn Adams <> wrote:
> > You over-generalize when you
> > imply that one such restrictive license effectively prohibits a
> meaningful
> > use of a mechanism with a non-restrictive policy.
> What would be a meaningful use of the proposed mechanism with a
> non-restrictive policy? (HTML5 video already supports cases where the
> user is not treated as an adversary.)

adversary? customers aren't usually viewed as adversaries... let's tone
done the hyperbole please

Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 19:21:41 UTC