W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dWCkVBQp8xH1yyLMqW6f5+_sKOM2dkfp1E9=L2qveq0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: john@netpurgatory.com, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> > You over-generalize when you
> > imply that one such restrictive license effectively prohibits a
> meaningful
> > use of a mechanism with a non-restrictive policy.
> What would be a meaningful use of the proposed mechanism with a
> non-restrictive policy? (HTML5 video already supports cases where the
> user is not treated as an adversary.)

adversary? customers aren't usually viewed as adversaries... let's tone
done the hyperbole please
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 19:21:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:48 UTC