W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:55:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQvAufCG5He31zC2bqvsKYdOhhkjvxH_G6bkqtnb3Hk0Gf_ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: john@netpurgatory.com, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> You over-generalize when you
> imply that one such restrictive license effectively prohibits a meaningful
> use of a mechanism with a non-restrictive policy.

What would be a meaningful use of the proposed mechanism with a
non-restrictive policy? (HTML5 video already supports cases where the
user is not treated as an adversary.)

Henri Sivonen
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 18:55:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:48 UTC