Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals

Thanks for clarification. Well, if it's required for considering the issue at all, I would like to try to create proposal in nearest 2-3 days (this may be treated as my request to extend period for issue 200). Thanks.

P.S. To make it more clear for future tracker requests by others, it maybe makes sense to specify formal-proposal requirement briefly right inside _mailing-list message_ created once issue is raised. Decision-policy document, while maybe formally sufficient, seems to be too verbose and not enough clear for third-party people who raise issues for the first time (like me). Thanks.


21.02.2012, 04:29, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
> On 02/20/2012 07:06 PM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>
>> šCould you specify what does this mean?
>> šWhat change proposals are assumed? From who?
>> šIsn't raising issue itself a sufficient action by bug-reporter?
>> šThanks.
>
> Here's a description of what is expected in a change proposal:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#change-proposal
>
> Somebody needs to provide the summary, rationale, proposal details, and
> evaluate the impact of the proposed change. šIf those had been provided,
> we would ask for alternate or counter proposals. šRequests that do not
> provide this information are deferred to whatever might happen to come
> after HTML5.
>
> If somebody plans to work on this, and needs a small extension, they
> should make a request now. šThe longer it goes, the less likely the
> chairs are to grant such an extension.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>> š21.02.2012, 03:56, "Sam Ruby"<rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>>> šOn 01/17/2012 09:49 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>>>> ššš'Allow wrapping LEGEND (or new iLEGEND) in non-FIELDSET elements'
>>>>
>>>> šššPer the HTML WG Decision Policy, at this time the chairs would like
>>>> šššto solicit volunteers to write Change Proposals for ISSUE-200:
>>>>
>>>> šššhttp://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/200
>>>> šššhttp://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation
>>>>
>>>> ššššIf no Change Proposals are written by February 16th, 2012, this
>>>> šššissue will be closed without prejudice.
>>> šAs we have received no change proposals, we are now marking this issue
>>> šas closed without prejudice.
>>>> šššIssue status link:
>>>> šššhttp://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-200
>>>>
>>>> ššš/paulc HTML WG co-chair
>>>>
>>>> šššPaul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E
>>>> ššš6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>>> š- Sam Ruby

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:45:54 UTC