- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:29:29 -0500
- To: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 02/20/2012 07:06 PM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote: > Could you specify what does this mean? > What change proposals are assumed? From who? > Isn't raising issue itself a sufficient action by bug-reporter? > Thanks. Here's a description of what is expected in a change proposal: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#change-proposal Somebody needs to provide the summary, rationale, proposal details, and evaluate the impact of the proposed change. If those had been provided, we would ask for alternate or counter proposals. Requests that do not provide this information are deferred to whatever might happen to come after HTML5. If somebody plans to work on this, and needs a small extension, they should make a request now. The longer it goes, the less likely the chairs are to grant such an extension. - Sam Ruby > 21.02.2012, 03:56, "Sam Ruby"<rubys@intertwingly.net>: >> On 01/17/2012 09:49 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: >> >>> 'Allow wrapping LEGEND (or new iLEGEND) in non-FIELDSET elements' >>> >>> Per the HTML WG Decision Policy, at this time the chairs would like >>> to solicit volunteers to write Change Proposals for ISSUE-200: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/200 >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation >>> >>> If no Change Proposals are written by February 16th, 2012, this >>> issue will be closed without prejudice. >> >> As we have received no change proposals, we are now marking this issue >> as closed without prejudice. >> >>> Issue status link: >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-200 >>> >>> /paulc HTML WG co-chair >>> >>> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E >>> 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 >> >> - Sam Ruby >
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:29:55 UTC