- From: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:31:54 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
Hi Sam, You wrote: > One thing all of the proposals on the table have in common is that they > remove the current generator exception. Yes, though the stated rationale for removing it differs among the various proposals. > As such, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on the following > Change Proposal: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/Issue31cMetaGeneratorUpdated > > If anybody would like to raise an objection during this time, we will > require them to accompany their objection with a concrete and complete > change proposal which retains the current exception. I don't object to the details section of that proposal, but I'm not crazy about a lot of the rationale. Given that I support the spec change in the details section, I support this CfC, but if the CfC goes through, I'd like to ask the Chairs to narrowly construe such consensus, given the differences as to *why* people think this change is desirable. Thanks! Ted
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:32:27 UTC