- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:11:27 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On 8/22/2012 9:54 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 08/22/2012 12:23 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: >> On 8/22/2012 6:07 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> On 08/02/2012 04:06 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: >>>> Hi Paul, >>>> >>>> In regards to the text in question I am prepared to withdraw my change >>>> proposal in favour of Teds. >>> >>> This leaves only one active Change Proposal on this issue: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-201&oldid=13386 >>> >>> >>> At the current time, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on >>> this proposal. If anybody would like to raise an objection during >>> this time, we will require them to accompany their objection with a >>> concrete and complete change proposal. >>> >>> If no objections are raised to this call by August 30th, 2012, we will >>> direct the editors to make the proposed change, and will only consider >>> subsequently reopening this issue based on new information and a >>> complete change proposal based on the spec's contents as it exists >>> after this change is applied. >> >> The "Eoconnor" CP is a vast departure from the spec as it existed prior >> and as it is implemented. >> I don't believe one week is enough time to complete and submit a >> concrete counter-proposal. > > Some relevant context: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jan/0080.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0267.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Apr/0068.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0062.html > > The chairs are not likely to grant an unbounded request for additional > time. Please extend the deadline to Sept 7th. -Charles
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 17:11:49 UTC