Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Aryeh Gregor <> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <> wrote:
>> The "strict" version does allow publicly available betas and the like. I'm curious whether anyone supports allowing non-public or experimental builds. I'll also check whether those who suggested this feel strongly about it.
> I think any publicly-available implementation should definitely count.
>  If it's interoperable to the level we want, why should we care if the
> implementer doesn't want to release it to all their users yet for some
> reason, or labels it "experimental"?

Are builds with narrow circulation sufficient to prove web compat,
assuming that's the interoperability we're fundamentally after?

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 12:28:20 UTC