- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:27:33 +0100
- To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> The "strict" version does allow publicly available betas and the like. I'm curious whether anyone supports allowing non-public or experimental builds. I'll also check whether those who suggested this feel strongly about it. > > I think any publicly-available implementation should definitely count. > If it's interoperable to the level we want, why should we care if the > implementer doesn't want to release it to all their users yet for some > reason, or labels it "experimental"? Are builds with narrow circulation sufficient to prove web compat, assuming that's the interoperability we're fundamentally after? -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 12:28:20 UTC