RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-198 innerHTML-patent-policy by Amicable Resolution

I have updated the Change Proposal details indicating that Microsoft has volunteered to edit. Ultimately, of course, the decision of who to appoint to edit is a decision of the chairs. We have volunteered. There may be other volunteers. The chairs might choose to approach someone else. That is their call.

Cheers,

Adrian.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Cotton 
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:32 PM
To: Tony Ross; Adrian Bateman
Cc: public-html@w3.org; Anne van Kesteren; Sam Ruby
Subject: RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-198 innerHTML-patent-policy by Amicable Resolution

>1) If someone from Microsoft is going to become the editor the "Details" section of the CP is incorrect. 
>2) Is someone from Microsoft becoming the editor of that document and publishing that document part of this CP and CfC for this CP or not?

The Chairs would like to recommend that the author of the ISSUE-198 Change Proposal [1] clarify the change proposal to make clear what is being proposed with regard to the editorship and publication of this document.  

If and when this is done then the Chairs will restart this CfC.

/paulc
HTML WG co-chair

[1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/Reference_a_W3C_version_of_DOM_Parsing_and_Serialization 

PS:  I am also sending this email to Adrian since I know that Tony is off on personal leave.

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:33 AM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: Paul Cotton; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-198 innerHTML-patent-policy by Amicable Resolution

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:25:38 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
wrote:
> If you have reason to doubt Tony Ross's offer on behalf of Microsoft, 
> you are welcome to raise an objection on this call for consensus:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0479.html


1) If someone from Microsoft is going to become the editor the "Details"  
section of the CP is incorrect. 2) Is someone from Microsoft becoming the editor of that document and publishing that document part of this CP and CfC for this CP or not? It's not clear from your boilerplate text or the "Details" section of the CP.


--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:02:32 UTC