- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:36:02 +0200
- To: "Aaron Colwell" <acolwell@google.com>, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:20:20 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> > wrote: >> >> Adaptive Streaming in HTML5 applications: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Dec/0120.html >> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/ADR_Error_Codes#Architectural_Models > > If this is non-controversial, I would suggest to just keep it in this > forum and work towards inclusion into HTML asap. I wouldn't want to > delay it by moving it into a TF whose focus is elsewhere. The adaptive > streaming is pretty important stuff that people are asking for > independently of encryption and want to use in particular for live > streaming of HTML5 video, but also to provide more adequate quality > video to the users. > > The Encrypted Media TF can discuss and propose changes to this > proposal that are required for encryption purposes, but I do not > believe that it would require a fundamentally different approach to > adaptive streaming. I agree, adaptive streaming does not need to be tied to "content protection" and creating a task force covering both seems like a bad idea. They are both related to HTMLMediaElement, but so are a lot of other features that would presumably not be included. Opera is interested in adaptive streaming and would not like to see it mixed up with the more controversial issues. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 08:36:28 UTC