- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:24:26 -0400
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 04/04/2012 09:30 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 03/27/2012 07:08 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-184 >> >> "Add a data element" >> >> ---- >> >> Change Proposals: >> >> http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik/data_element >> http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Cjones/ISSUE-184 >> >> Both Change Proposals for ISSUE-184 agree on adding a <data> element and >> most of its details. In fact, the latter proposal explicitly includes >> all of the Details from the former by reference. >> >> The latter proposal differs in that it adds a "type" attribute to the >> <data> and <output> elements. >> >> The chairs plan to take a similar approach to what we did with 183 and >> just call for consensus on the addition of <date>. This would obviate >> the need to review Tantek's Change Proposal and would allow much of >> Cameron's Change Proposal to be removed. > > At the current time, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on > Tantek's data_element proposal. If anybody would like to raise an > objection during this time, we will require them to accompany their > objection with a concrete and complete change proposal. > > If no objections are raised to this call by April 11th 2012, we will > consider that part of this issue closed, and will proceed to evaluate > arguments for and against the addition of a "type" attribute. The call for consensus passes. Reminder, feedback on the 184 proposals was posted here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Mar/0737.html - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 14:25:04 UTC