- From: John C. Vernaleo <john@netpurgatory.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:01:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-html@w3.org
The Objective section of that seems fairly close to the problem statement Boris wants (and I think I agree) for the Media Task Force. It is phrased differently than you would phrase a problem statement or goals, but I think it fits a very similar role. On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Laura Carlson wrote: > Hi Boris, > >> On 4/12/12 4:24 PM, Clarke Stevens wrote: >>> >>> Do we need to have a solution everyone agrees will solve the problem >>> before we can get permission to ask the question in a structured forum? >> >> No, but we need to have a problem statement that everyone agrees on. >> >> Or put another way, once a solution is proposed we need a way of evaluating >> whether it solves "the problem", which means we need to be somewhat clear on >> "the problem". > > The accessibility task force has a work statement [1] with sections on: > * Status > * Objective > * Scope of Work > * Work Approach > * Participation > * Facilitation > * Participants > > However, it has no measurable goals. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/html-task-force > > Best Regards, > Laura > -- > Laura L. Carlson > >
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 21:01:41 UTC