- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:16:20 +0200
- To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:45:14 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > The scope of the Encrypted Media proposal is insufficient to create > interoperable implementations. In particular, we know that the authors of > the Encrypted Media proposal are planning to use it with CDMs other than > the ClearKey CDM in the proposal, but we have no information about what > those CDMs are or how UAs other than the authors' own would interface > with > them (despite that information having been requested right at the > beginning > of the discussion). > > Obviously the W3C should not bless, or be seen as blessing, a > specification > that cannot be interoperably implemented. Therefore, the Media TF needs > to > be constituted to ensure that it either produces a spec that can be > interoperably implemented (e.g., Encrypted Media plus details of the CDMs > that will be used and how any UA can access them), or nothing at all. If > this condition can't be imposed from the outset, then I oppose creating > the > TF. > > Rob I share this view. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 08:16:52 UTC