Re: "How Browsers Process URLs" aka "URL processing spec": HTML WG deliverable or I18N WG deliverable?

On 2011-11-21 12:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:17:09 +0100, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
>> I will be discussing that draft with the W3C I18N WG during their weekly
>> telcon tomorrow. One thing we are likely to discuss is whether that spec
>> should be a deliverable of the I18N WG, or whether it should be a
>> deliverable of the HTML WG.
>
> I think it should be defined in this draft (i.e. together with the URL
> API):
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/url/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>
> Which WG ends up defining URLs I could care less about. Though it would
> probably make sense if they reused the mailing list we have been using
> for URLs thus far.

Most discussions I have seen happened on the IRI mailing list. Is this 
the one you are referring to?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 12:19:28 UTC