W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2011

Re: "How Browsers Process URLs" aka "URL processing spec": HTML WG deliverable or I18N WG deliverable?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:18:51 +0100
To: public-html@w3.org, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v5am1pk464w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:17:09 +0100, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
> I will be discussing that draft with the W3C I18N WG during their weekly
> telcon tomorrow. One thing we are likely to discuss is whether that spec
> should be a deliverable of the I18N WG, or whether it should be a
> deliverable of the HTML WG.

I think it should be defined in this draft (i.e. together with the URL  


Which WG ends up defining URLs I could care less about. Though it would  
probably make sense if they reused the mailing list we have been using for  
URLs thus far.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 11:19:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:18 UTC