On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:46:26 +0100, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > So it sounds like the rendering will be an additional aspect that needs > to be taken into consideration and specced, rather than something that > will > require changes to what ted has already specced. Is that a reasonable > assumption? The ::cover part of Ted's proposal heavily overlaps with the kind of thing needed for fullscreen. Fullscreen solves it in a different way, ::cover has some missing details, and neither works well when combined or nested as far as I can tell. I might have misunderstood what you are saying though. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 10:55:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:45 UTC