- From: Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:38:21 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-html@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
2011/11/15 Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>: > > What would it take for you to decide? My intent isn't to rush anybody, but > to see if we can avoid any unnecessary work. For example, if there is > nobody who wishes to defend the pubdate attribute then that issue need not > be discussed further. > > Given the issues that Tantek has outlined, it looks like you might want to > object to up to two of the change proposals that he has produced: the one > for the time element and that introduces the data element. > > Of course even better than submitting a counter proposal would be to see if > you and (in this case) Tantek can work together to produce a common proposal > that you can both live with. > > My recommendation: if you aren't sure on a particular aspect, it probably > isn't worth objecting on that aspect. > >> - Peter Winnberg > > - Sam Ruby> I have created a very rough first draft of a proposal so that people can get a better idea of what I mean that can be found here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Pwinnber/content_attribute I will continue to work on it and add more detail, and see if I can respond to feedback / objections to it.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:38:51 UTC