Re: noted 3 issues re: time/data (was Re: minutes for HTML WG f2f, 2011-11-04, part 1)

2011/11/15 Sam Ruby <>:
> What would it take for you to decide?  My intent isn't to rush anybody, but
> to see if we can avoid any unnecessary work.  For example, if there is
> nobody who wishes to defend the pubdate attribute then that issue need not
> be discussed further.
> Given the issues that Tantek has outlined, it looks like you might want to
> object to up to two of the change proposals that he has produced: the one
> for the time element and that introduces the data element.
> Of course even better than submitting a counter proposal would be to see if
> you and (in this case) Tantek can work together to produce a common proposal
> that you can both live with.
> My recommendation: if you aren't sure on a particular aspect, it probably
> isn't worth objecting on that aspect.
>> - Peter Winnberg
> - Sam Ruby>

I have created a very rough first draft of a proposal so that people
can get a better idea of what I mean that can be found here:

I will continue to work on it and add more detail, and see if I can
respond to feedback / objections to it.

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:38:51 UTC